Orca is trained in two sizes: 0.8B and 4B parameters. On text benchmarks, Orca-4B achieves an average score of 51.8% on MVBench, TemporalBench, 3DSRBench, and SWITCH, surpassing small vision-language models like Qwen3.5-4B, Gemma 4-4B, and DeepSeek-VL2-3B, as well as larger world models Emu3 (8B) and Emu3.5 (34B). However, in individual tests, Qwen3.5-4B still leads on MVBench.
For image prediction, BAAI constructed its own benchmark PRICE-V0.1 using real robot and first-person scenarios, requiring the model to generate resulting images based on instructions (e.g., 'Close the microwave'). Orca-4B averages 59.8%, surpassing FLUX.2 small (56.1%), FLUX.1-context (40.9%), and OmniGen2 (39.6%). Orca outperforms pure image models in preserving robot shape, object contact points, and instruction consistency, while the latter often introduce irrelevant objects or hallucinated hands.
Robot control experiments use a wheeled dual-arm humanoid robot performing five manipulation tasks: placing books on shelves, stacking bowls, scooping sugar, etc. Orca matches the performance of the specialized system π0.5, which is directly trained on robot action data. Orca's base model never saw action labels during pre-training; only later, for each task, it trained the action expert module using 200 real-world recordings (camera images and corresponding actions). In comparison, V-JEPA 2.1 and Qwen3.5 with the same control module lag significantly. Interestingly, Orca demonstrates error recovery: after a failed grasp, it retries, while π0.5 falls into repeated failures under the same circumstances.