Back to feed
News Story
The Guardian AI
1 sources

Refugees in Kenya are powering tech for dwindling pay

In Kenya's Kakuma refugee camp, refugees work as gig workers for tech companies, using tools like ChatGPT for translation and research tasks, often without knowing their pay or if they will be paid. They face dwindling wages and the threat of AI automating their jobs, while being unable to legally work in Kenya. The article highlights the exploitation and uncertainty in this hidden labor force powering AI data work.

SynthePulse Insight · AI deep reading

Kakuma's "Invisible Architects": At the Bottom of the AI Supply Chain, Why the Pay Keeps Shrinking

Version 1 · 1 source

In Kenya's Kakuma refugee camp, more than 300,000 residents depend almost entirely on humanitarian aid. Refugees do data annotation, content moderation and translation for tech companies, yet they are not guaranteed wages and can only wait for opaque "discretionary rewards." Meanwhile, entry-level tech work is being replaced by AI. Who benefits? The answer the reporting gives is not optimistic.

  • The Guardian interviewed more than 20 refugees in Kakuma, showing that only one side clearly benefits from this arrangement.
  • AOP Connect is a crowdsourced research platform under RWS, a British AI enterprise software company, where refugees perform micro-work such as translation.
  • RWS can grant "discretionary rewards" of up to $500 based on six criteria, but refugees are not guaranteed wages; most receive far less than the cap and no one tells them why.
  • A hymn research project was listed with a $9,000 reward pool, but that amount is divided among an unknown number of contributors and is a discretionary "reward," not a guaranteed wage.
  • Scale AI subsidiary Remotasks exited Kenya in 2024; before that, workers earned about 500 to 1,000 Kenyan shillings a day (roughly $3 to $6).
  • Fewer than half of households in Kakuma have income, and those that do earn less than $50 a month; a South Sudanese software engineer says entry-level work is disappearing because of AI.
Open section navigationAn Arrangement Packaged as a "Win-Win"

An Arrangement Packaged as a "Win-Win"

In the Kakuma refugee camp in northern Kenya, near the border with South Sudan, refugees do remote gig work such as content moderation and data annotation for tech companies. This kind of work was once promoted by UN agencies and global tech companies as a win-win: refugees get income opportunities, and AI and social media companies get cheap labor.

But The Guardian interviewed more than 20 refugees in Kakuma and concluded that only one side clearly benefits from this arrangement. Tech companies used datasets processed by precarious workers, including refugees, to build their most powerful tools; and the refugees' pay, already low, now seems to be evaporating as entry-level tech work disappears.

A refugee using the pseudonym Grace is one example. She uses ChatGPT to research Christian hymn translations in a language she does not speak, translating English text into an assigned East Asian language, then using the translation results to search for existing versions and look up information about translators, authors and denominations, and finally submitting these details to AOP Connect. She does not know who the client is, what the purpose of the work is, or whether she will be paid.

"Rewards" Instead of Wages: An Opaque Pricing Mechanism

AOP Connect is a crowdsourced research platform under RWS, a British AI enterprise software company. According to RWS researcher documents and manuals reviewed by The Guardian, if RWS judges the work to be high quality under six criteria, it can grant a "discretionary reward" of up to $500.

The problem is that refugees are not guaranteed wages. Asha Luka Abdallah, a mentor at SIR (the Solidarity Initiative for Refugees), said most people receive far less than the maximum, and no one tells them why. RWS says higher-quality work brings higher pay, but according to project participants and payment notices reviewed by The Guardian, there is almost no transparency about how evaluations are conducted.

On AOP Connect, Grace saw that the hymn research project was listed with a $9,000 reward pool. But that amount is divided among an unknown number of contributors, and it is a discretionary "reward" rather than a guaranteed wage — a point already stated in the project listing's description.

An AOP Connect spokesperson responded that the platform "is not AI-driven, nor is it used for AI model training work," that the reward structure is communicated "transparently in advance," and that pay is based on the quality, relevance and timeliness of submitted research. The spokesperson also said confidentiality is crucial to AOP's clients. But The Guardian's report provides no independent verification, and whether the platform is actually used for AI model training remains in doubt.

From Remotasks to AOP: Gig Channels Are Narrowing

Kakuma was not always like this. It was originally established as a temporary home for people fleeing the Second Sudanese Civil War, and later took in people from Somalia, Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. More than 30 years later, it has become one of the world's largest refugee camps, with rows of tin-roofed buildings that make it look more like a permanent town.

The area around the camp is arid and severely short of water, agriculture is not viable, and more than 300,000 residents depend almost entirely on humanitarian aid. In a place like this, any income has value: fewer than half of households have income, and those that do earn less than $50 a month.

A few years ago, SIR staff said they could easily find data annotation, transcription and translation work for students on platforms such as Remotasks. SIR has trained more than 2,000 refugees and connected more than half of them to remote tech work, ranging from long-term employment to short-term gigs.

But Scale AI subsidiary Remotasks exited Kenya in 2024. SIR's Hydrogene said that before Remotasks shut down, workers typically took home 500 to 1,000 Kenyan shillings a day, about $3 to $6. The income was low, but in Kakuma it was hard to come by. After the channels narrowed, some people had to accept work that substitutes potential "rewards" for guaranteed wages.

Entry-Level Positions Are Disappearing

For tech workers in Kakuma, the bad news does not end with the platform's exit. A South Sudanese software engineer said that because of AI, entry-level work is disappearing, and senior engineers no longer hire interns or junior positions. He himself obtained well-paid work through SIR and the French organization Konexio, but he worries about future workers.

This observation fits a broader picture: tech companies build tools using datasets processed by precarious workers, and those tools are in turn replacing entry-level tech work. But the report provides no quantitative evidence that AI is replacing entry-level work; the interviewee's personal observation can only serve as a signal of a trend, not a definitive conclusion.

The Nairobi-based Data Labelers Association calls these workers the tech industry's "invisible architects," arguing that they sit within an opaque supply chain. The association's founding chair, Joan Kinyua, has done much of this work herself, and she points out that the micro-work economy is often exploitative.

Legal Status Locks Refugees into Gig Work

There is a key constraint in Grace's situation: as a refugee who cannot legally work in Kenya, she needs any opportunity she can get. This explains why she still took on the hymn research project without knowing the client, the purpose or the pay.

Work on AOP Connect is bound by confidentiality agreements, and workers may not disclose clients or work content. Grace requested anonymity because of the confidentiality agreement. This confidentiality arrangement, layered on top of the opaque reward mechanism, makes it hard for workers to judge what their labor is worth and hard for them to organize for better conditions.

The report does not provide the full extent or time trend of the "continuous shrinking" of refugee gig pay, nor systematic data on the actual income and job stability of refugees whom SIR connected to remote work. These gaps are themselves a limitation of the reporting and a reflection of the state of this issue: changes in the pay of the workers at the very bottom often lack trackable data.

Credibility boundary

This article is based on an investigative report by The Guardian dated October 8, 2026. The report interviewed more than 20 refugees in Kakuma and reviewed RWS researcher documents and payment notices, making it first-hand investigation. But some key information comes from a single source or an interviewee's personal observation: the daily income figure before Remotasks closed comes from SIR's Hydrogene; the claim that entry-level work is disappearing because of AI comes from a South Sudanese software engineer's personal observation and lacks quantitative evidence; whether AOP Connect is used for AI model training is denied by the company, and the report provides no independent verification. How the hymn project's $9,000 reward is divided among an unknown number of contributors, and how RWS's six evaluation criteria actually operate, both lack transparent explanation.

Insight takeaway

The Kakuma case reveals an opaque AI supply chain: constrained by being unable to work legally, refugees can only accept micro-work that substitutes discretionary "rewards" for guaranteed wages, while entry-level tech positions are being replaced by AI. What the report can confirm is that the pay mechanism is opaque, the channels are narrowing, and the main beneficiaries are tech companies; as for the speed and extent of AI replacing entry-level work, and whether the platform is used for model training, there is still a lack of independent verification.

Secondary coverage

The Guardian AI

Refugees in Kenya are powering tech for dwindling pay

This article also covers this event; its overall headline is not the event headline.