In sync with the new display format, OpenAI is expanding its measurement tools. Advertisers can send conversion data to ChatGPT Ads through Hightouch, Tealium, and LiveRamp, and attribution providers such as AppsFlyer, Adjust, and Branch have also joined the system.
On performance measurement, OpenAI is testing geographic-based experiments through Haus, Measured, and WorkMagic to measure the actual impact of ads. On brand safety, OpenAI is running pilot projects with DoubleVerify and Integral Ad Science to evaluate the ad environment without accessing real user conversations. In addition, some advertisers can set negative keywords to avoid their ads appearing in inappropriate conversations.
Looking at these moves together, it can be inferred (inference): OpenAI is pushing advertising from "can it be run" to "how is it counted, how accurate is the counting, and how do we prevent problems." Conversion postbacks, attribution, geographic experiments, brand safety, and negative keywords each correspond to one of the most common gates in advertisers' purchasing decisions.
But uncertainty must be flagged: whether geographic-based experiments can accurately measure the actual impact of ads remains to be verified; whether the brand safety pilot can effectively evaluate the ad environment without accessing real conversations is likewise uncertain. These two points determine that the above infrastructure is currently closer to "under construction" than "completed."