The team self-reports that UniWAM achieved an average success rate of 99.2% on the LIBERO benchmark, an overall success rate of 92.6% on LIBERO-Plus, which introduces various environmental perturbations, and a success rate of 68.32% on the RoboTwin 2.0 randomized environment test (C2R). The SOTA rankings for these three results are limited only to the highest values among the methods listed in the corresponding tables of the paper, and are not a comprehensive comparison against all published methods.
LIBERO-Plus evaluates model robustness across seven dimensions: background, camera viewpoint, language instructions, lighting, object layout, robot initial state, and sensor noise. The team self-reports that UniWAM achieved the highest scores among the methods listed in the paper in four evaluations—robot initial state, language, lighting, and background—and reached an 84.6% success rate in the object layout variation evaluation.
Switching from the standard environment (C2C) to the randomized environment (C2R), the team self-reports that UniWAM's success rate dropped by only 6.82 percentage points, and it achieved the highest score among the listed methods in the C2R test. This drop is used to support the model's generalization ability to environmental changes, but it is likewise limited by the comparison scope of the methods listed in the paper's tables.