Reco is not facing a blank market. Public Crunchbase and PitchBook records show at least two dozen companies selling some form of AI agent security product.
These vendors' products have different emphases: some scrutinize the tools agents use, some help enterprises control the data agents can reach, some like CrowdStrike build detection and response controls on the devices where agents run, and others focus on discovering and resolving unapproved AI use.
But their promises sound quite similar, all involving knowledge graphs, continuous monitoring, runtime security, tool access, MCP scrutiny and so on. Some vendors are even updating their products to hop on this bandwagon.
This crowding means Reco's differentiation cannot be built simply on "we also do agent security." It needs to prove that its context graph, 280-plus integrations and existing SaaS coverage bring visibility or control that others do not have, and the report provided no independent comparison in this regard.